By Saul McLeodupdated The nature vs. Nature is what we think of as pre-wiring and is influenced by genetic inheritance and other biological factors. Nurture is generally taken as the influence of external factors after conception, e. The nature-nurture debate is concerned with the relative contribution that both influences make to human behavior.
I'll just jump in on a few of those. A lot of your questions are not about so much nature vs nuture but just the mechanics of natural or unnatural selection.
However you only wanted that one piece and there isn't just those two attributes Without looking at the DNA? Breed the parents, get a lot of offspring, and test them all for all of your phenotypes of interest not just potency, but also colonization efficiency, size, yield, etc On top of this you need a breeding program that aims to avoid inbreeding depression.
As you can imagine, this is a lot of slow work. It's actually for this reason that modern commercial breeding does use a 'DNA test' to streamline the process. The technique is called 'marker-assisted selection' if you're interested.
Also if this is the case then wouldn't isolating after a certain point create the possibility of creating a sample devoid of the actual intended properties? Poor breeding practices would likely result in severe inbreeding depression, and a decrease in fitness in even the selected traits.
Thank you for the response Doodlin this is exactly the discussion I was trying to pin down. So in response to your first answer to my question is if we go back to multispore with a cap from a depressed or inbred mushroom will that yield the possibility of having an offspring spore with the 'original' genetic traits in tact?
I remembering doing a study once on the phenotype of a flower with always closed pistols but after years of breeding depression went to open pistols. The possibility of a 'normal' offspring isn't completely out of the realm of possibility until a certain point within the isolation when you would get a double allele on each monocyte so no matter what happened they would always have the same genetic disposition.
So is it better to not isolate out without a genetic test you think? Or is it possibility to revert to a less isolated genetic generation using a multispore? In which you could revert back to an earlier phenotype is you so desired.Nature vs.
Nurture The nature versus nurture debate is one of the oldest debates in psychology. The nature aspect, which is the more scientific theory of the two, is the idea that genes have a greater impact on a person’s development.
Essay about Nature V Nurture. Unit 4- development through the life stages M1- Discuss the nature-nurture debate in relation to Individual development In this assignment I will be discussing the nature-nurture debate in relation to the development of an individual.
A Biologist Moves Past The Nature Vs. Nurture Debate. Anne Fausto-Sterling, Brown University December 11, May 23, Share 6. Tweet she spoke to Footnote about her research, the nature versus nurture debate, and why academia makes it hard to think outside the box.
which is you have to follow individuals through time. The nature versus nurture debate is a debate about whether our characteristics are because of genetics or because of the environment. It's a very old debate. It's a very old debate.
David Moore: For the longest time, the nature-nurture debate has been cast as a kind of contest between genes and experiences. The thought was that we might have some characteristics that are caused primarily by genetic factors and other characteristics that .
That is, it can be nature (a person born with genetic abnormalities in the brain, causing a chemical imbalance), or "nurture." A person can be born normal in all psychological aspects, but, because of being subjected to extreme cruelty or abuse or neglect as a child, can have his psych and emotional mindset altered in such a way as to cause him.