He feels that watching TV makes us smarter because why we view things we might have never heard of before. She feels that sometimes watching TV is not the best thing to do. But as reading both articles I have to agree more with Steven Johnson the reason why being is because I do think TV does makes us smarter.
This approach certainly has its shortcomings as a method its almost exclusively textual focus and ahistorical naturebut it could valuably be employed to shake up the current television canon. Would that were the case. Instead, we find ourselves with yet another argument as to why The Sopranos is the best show in television history and do we really need another one?
A television text is complex, according to Johnson, based on how many narrative threads it has operating at any one time, its degree of seriality, how much information it conveys, and the number of characters in motion.
Quantity over quality is important here — the more plot threads, the more info, the more characters, the more intensely serial — the more complex and therefore better the text.
Depth is most easily demonstrated in programs that focus on relationships between people or single ethical or social dilemmas rather than a relentless move through plot points.
And depth is often difficult to achieve in programs that are overpopulated. Johnson fails to recognize that the psychological shifts in individuals and the social reverberations taking place among couples and small groups also constitute complexity, just as the presentation of an ethical or social problem on any non-serial program can solicit complex analyses.
Roseanne may only have six characters, yet the relationships between them and the cultural critique the program offers is as or more complex as any episode of The Sopranos. The critiques of normative white masculinity these shows offer reflected in the class, racial and sexual diversity of their casts would seem to make them arguably more complex than The Sopranos, yet Johnson follows the lead of many critics by neglecting to mention or promote them.
Thus, intelligence here, again, is not about relationship depth or complexity or social critique upon which much comedy dependsor even the kinds of social knowledge some audiences might be getting by watching Will and Grace.
May 08, · Johnson says that watching TV can make you smarter. This flies in the face of everything I've lectured about in the last 10 years. I say this not as a neurologist but as an avid TV . Jan 24, · Steven Johnson’s essay “Watching TV Makes You Smarter” is very outside the box. He explains how certain TV series a few decades ago have hidden arrows pointing to the point of a plot, basically giving you clues on what is going on instead of letting you figure it out on your own. lets the reader know that he believes that even the worst television shows on today are much more interesting and captivating than those of the past. He argues that people can pull much more from television today and that even the simplest shows can make viewers more intelligent. He .
But do we really want to be training a nation of Karl Roves? Although primarily concerned with the text, Johnson does at times address the existence of an audience.
In this claim, Johnson ignores a whole history of creative fan activity surrounding television, in which underground fanzines as well as other types of creative activity have been flourishing for years. Again, however, I single out Johnson only because his point of view is so representative of pervading trends in liberal television studies.
Indeed, even some of my television studies colleagues have argued with me about the superiority of texts like Lost or Alias on the basis of their structural complexity, as if that alone determined their cultural significance. But, ultimately, such an approach seems to me to undermine the original purpose of popular culture studies:Apr 24, · The usual counterargument here is that what media have lost in moral clarity, they have gained in realism.
The real world doesn't come in nicely .
In the article Watching TV Makes You Smarter by Steven Johnson, the author argues that by watching television shows various television shows, people actually become smarter and how it has a big impact in our lives.
Oct 03, · This essay by Steven Johnson really made me think – in a much different way than the narratives we’ve previously read in class.
I really enjoyed hearing Johnson’s spirited opinions about the benefits of modern TV watching and the concept of the Sleeper Curve. Watching TV Makes You Smart Essay In the article Watching TV Makes You Smarter by Steven Johnson, the author argues that by watching television shows various television shows, people actually become smarter and how it has a big impact in our lives - Watching TV Makes You Smart .
lets the reader know that he believes that even the worst television shows on today are much more interesting and captivating than those of the past. He argues that people can pull much more from television today and that even the simplest shows can make viewers more intelligent.
He shows charts of. Watching Tv Makes You Smart Essay Words Dec 5th, 5 Pages In the article Watching TV Makes You Smarter by Steven Johnson, the author argues that by watching television shows various television shows, people actually become smarter and how it has a big impact in our lives.